AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism Lab InvestigationsCalculus Based Inquiry Across All 5 Units
The standard inquiry based investigations for AP Physics C: E&M, aligned to all five CED units, with purpose, method, calculus connection, and how each investigation directly connects to FRQ experimental design subparts.
The required AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism lab investigations
- 1
Mapping Electric Fields and Equipotential Surfaces
BI1, BI2Students place two conducting electrodes in a shallow conducting solution and use a voltage sensor or multimeter to map points of equal potential, tracing equipotential curves across the tray. Field lines are then drawn perpendicular to the equipotential curves, revealing the spatial structure of the electric field between and around the electrodes. The investigation makes the abstract relationship E equals negative dV/dr concrete and measurable: where equipotential lines are closely spaced, the field is strong. Students connect their mapped field geometry to Gauss's law predictions and the superposition principle, explaining why field lines originate on positive charge and terminate on negative charge. Measurements include potential at a grid of points, spacing between equipotentials, and the direction of the local field vector. Uncertainty analysis covers probe positioning error and contact resistance in the conducting solution.
On the exam: FRQ subparts ask students to sketch field lines consistent with a given charge distribution and describe the quantitative relationship between electric field magnitude and the spacing of equipotential surfaces.
- 2
Charging and Discharging a Capacitor (RC Circuit Transient)
BI2, BI3Students build a resistor capacitor circuit and use an oscilloscope or voltage data logger to capture the voltage across the capacitor as it charges from zero to a supply voltage and then discharges back to zero through the resistor. The raw V versus t graph is an exponential approach and exponential decay. Students linearize the charging data by plotting ln(V final minus V) versus t, obtaining a straight line whose slope is the negative inverse of the time constant tau equals RC. They verify that the experimentally extracted tau agrees with the value calculated from the nominal R and C values. The investigation requires applying initial conditions to the general solution of the first order differential equation dQ/dt plus Q/RC equals V/R and connecting the mathematical solution to the physical circuit behavior. Sources of error include parasitic resistance in leads and the internal resistance of the voltage source.
On the exam: Students must write and solve the RC differential equation and sketch Q(t) and I(t) with correct initial and asymptotic values in FRQ responses, precisely the skills the linearization exercise builds.
- 3
Kirchhoff's Laws in Multi Loop DC Circuits
BI3Students construct a multi loop resistor network containing at least two independent loops and one junction, predict the current through and voltage across every element using Kirchhoff's junction rule and loop rule, then measure each quantity with a multimeter. The comparison of predicted and measured values reveals the precision of the ideal resistor model and highlights real world effects such as battery internal resistance. Students practice setting up the system of simultaneous equations that Kirchhoff's rules produce, labeling current directions, choosing loop traversal direction consistently, and applying the sign conventions for voltage rises and drops. This investigation is the foundation for all multi element circuit analysis on the exam, including circuits with capacitors in various configurations. Uncertainty estimation covers multimeter precision and resistor tolerance.
On the exam: FRQs present a circuit diagram and ask students to write Kirchhoff's junction and loop equations and solve for unknown currents, the exact procedure practiced in this investigation.
- 4
Mapping the Magnetic Field of a Current Carrying Wire and Bar Magnet
BI4Students use a Hall probe or compass array to map the magnetic field surrounding a long straight current carrying wire and a bar magnet, recording field direction and relative magnitude at a grid of points around each source. For the long straight wire, students plot B versus 1/r to verify the Biot Savart prediction that B is proportional to I divided by r at perpendicular distance r from an infinite straight wire. The bar magnet mapping reveals the dipole field geometry: field lines exiting the north pole and entering the south pole, with the field strength falling off faster than 1/r with distance. Students apply Ampere's law qualitatively by tracing closed paths around the wire and reasoning about the enclosed current. The investigation connects the abstract line integral of B dot dL to a physical measurement strategy using the compass or Hall probe.
On the exam: FRQ subparts ask students to apply the Biot Savart law integral and Ampere's law to calculate the magnetic field of a long wire, solenoid, or toroid, tasks that become routine after physically mapping the field geometry in this investigation.
- 5
Electromagnetic Induction: Faraday's Law Verification
BI5Students move a bar magnet through a solenoid connected to a galvanometer or voltage data logger and measure the induced EMF as a function of magnet speed, field strength, and number of coil turns. Faster motion, stronger field, and more turns each produce larger EMF, confirming that EMF equals negative d Phi B over dt quantitatively. Students change the sign of the induced EMF by reversing magnet direction, demonstrating Lenz's law: the induced current produces a field opposing the change in flux. The investigation builds facility with flux as a signed scalar quantity, the chain rule connecting flux change to motion, and the conceptual distinction between the rate of flux change (which determines EMF) and the total flux (which does not). Sources of error include finite galvanometer response time and fringe field effects at the coil ends.
On the exam: FRQs give a moving conductor or changing current in a field and ask for the induced EMF magnitude using Faraday's law, the direction of induced current using Lenz's law, and the resulting force on the conductor, precisely the quantities measured and predicted in this investigation.
- 6
RL Circuit Time Response
BI5Students build a series RL circuit with a known resistor and inductor, apply a step voltage using a signal generator or switch, and use an oscilloscope to capture the current rise from zero to its asymptotic value I max equals V/R. The current follows I(t) equals I max times (1 minus e to the negative Rt/L), and the time constant is tau equals L/R. Students linearize the data by plotting ln(I max minus I) versus t to extract tau experimentally, then compare to the value calculated from the nominal L and R. They also observe the current decay when the voltage source is removed, confirming that the inductor opposes changes in current in both directions. The investigation reinforces the mathematical analogy between RC and RL circuits while highlighting the physical difference: inductors store energy in a magnetic field, capacitors in an electric field. Students estimate L from the measured tau and the known R.
On the exam: FRQ subparts ask students to write and solve the RL differential equation, state initial and final conditions, and sketch I(t) with the correct time constant, all tasks rehearsed directly in this investigation.
College Board requires inquiry based lab investigations throughout the AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism course as a condition of course authorization, but it does not mandate a fixed numbered list of investigations identical across all schools in the same way it does for some other AP science courses. Local teachers adapt the investigations to available equipment, laboratory time, and student background. The six investigations listed here represent the standard E&M laboratory curriculum aligned to the Course and Exam Description's five units. All are conducted or simulated at most authorized AP Physics C: E&M programs, and all connect directly to the experimental design subparts that appear in the three free response questions on the exam.
Inquiry based investigations, not a fixed numbered national list
Lab requirement
All 5 E&M units have dedicated lab work
Units covered
Oscilloscopes, voltage sensors, Hall probes, galvanometers, multimeters
Key instruments
All labs produce data analyzed using calculus based models (exponential decay, 1/r laws, flux integrals)
Calculus connection
Lab notebooks and portfolios maintained throughout the course
Notebook requirement
Every investigation type (RC circuits, field mapping, induction) appears in past FRQs
Exam connection
Why do lab investigations matter for AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism?
Calculus alone is not enough. Every FRQ rubric rewards students who can design measurements, interpret real data, and connect experiment to equation.
AP Physics C: E&M free response questions routinely include experimental design subparts that ask students to describe a procedure to measure a physical quantity, identify sources of experimental error, and explain what the slope of a linearized graph represents physically. Students who have conducted the RC circuit investigation, the Faraday induction investigation, and the electric field mapping investigation recognize these questions immediately. They know that a V versus t graph for a charging capacitor has a slope determined by the time constant RC, that a Hall probe measures a magnetic field's direction as well as magnitude, and that doubling the number of coil turns in a Faraday induction setup doubles the induced EMF. These recognitions translate directly into the 3 to 5 experimental subpart points that textbook only students routinely miss. According to the AP Physics C: E&M Course and Exam Description published by College Board, science practices for experimental methods are explicitly assessed in the free response section, making hands on investigation experience a direct exam preparation strategy, not supplementary coursework.
What lab notebook skills are expected for AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism?
A well kept lab notebook is the proof that you understood the investigation well enough to reproduce it.
College Board expects AP Physics C: E&M students to document each investigation in a lab notebook or portfolio that captures the pre lab prediction, the experimental setup, all raw data tables with units and uncertainties, graphical analysis including linearization of exponential data, and a post lab conclusion that names the physical law verified. For the RC circuit investigation, a complete notebook entry includes the derivation of the differential equation, the general and particular solutions with initial conditions applied, the V versus t data table, the linearized plot of ln(V final minus V) versus t with the best fit slope and extracted time constant, a comparison of the experimental and theoretical tau values with percent discrepancy, and an identification of the dominant sources of error. For the Faraday induction investigation, it includes a pre lab prediction of which direction the galvanometer deflects for each magnet orientation and motion direction, the measured peak EMF values, a plot of EMF versus magnet speed, and a justification of why the slope of that graph is related to the product of N, B, and coil area. This level of documentation mirrors exactly the reasoning chain that FRQ graders reward, making the notebook a direct practice tool for the exam.
How do AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism lab investigations appear on the exam?
Experimental design subparts appear in free response questions every year, usually worth 3 to 5 points that textbook only students routinely miss.
The three free response questions on the AP Physics C: E&M exam are multi part problems, and a recurring category of subpart tests experimental reasoning directly. Typical subparts include: describe a procedure to measure the time constant of an RC circuit using the available equipment listed, identify two sources of experimental error in a circuit measurement and explain how each affects the result, explain what the slope of a graph of ln(V) versus t represents physically and what its numerical value should be for R and C, and sketch the expected shape of the I versus t graph if the resistance in the RL circuit is doubled. Students who have conducted these investigations with real oscilloscopes and data loggers answer these subparts fluently because they have already faced the same decisions: which instrument to use, where to connect the probes, how to read the decay curve, what happens when a component value changes. Students who have only worked problems from a textbook encounter these subparts for the first time under exam pressure and produce vague or incomplete responses that lose the available points. Per the AP Physics C: E&M Course and Exam Description, Science Practice 4 (Experimental Methods) is explicitly assessed in the free response section.
AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism labs FAQ
Do I need real lab equipment for AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism or can I use virtual labs?
Real equipment is strongly preferred because the exam's experimental subparts test skills that virtual simulations do not fully build: reading an oscilloscope trace under time pressure, estimating uncertainty from probe positioning, and explaining the effect of physical sources of error such as lead resistance or galvanometer response lag. That said, high fidelity simulations from PhET Interactive Simulations (University of Colorado) cover RC circuits, electromagnetic induction, and field mapping in enough detail to build the conceptual and graphical analysis skills the exam rewards. If your school lacks oscilloscopes, a PhET RC circuit simulation combined with careful data table and linearization practice develops the mathematical skills needed for the FRQ differential equation subparts. Verify with your teacher that the investigations you complete, real or simulated, cover the calculus based data analysis expected by the AP Physics C: E&M CED.
How does the RC circuit lab connect to the AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism free response questions?
The RC circuit investigation maps almost directly onto one of the most common AP Physics C: E&M free response question structures. A typical RC circuit FRQ asks students to write the differential equation for the charge on the capacitor as a function of time, solve it by separation of variables applying initial conditions, sketch Q(t) and I(t) with correct initial and asymptotic values, and determine how the time constant changes if a component value is modified. Every one of these subparts is practiced explicitly during the RC circuit investigation: writing the differential equation for Q or V, applying Q equals 0 at t equals 0 for charging, linearizing the exponential data to extract tau, and comparing experimental tau to the calculated value RC. Students who have done this investigation recognize the FRQ as a familiar task. Students who have not must derive the procedure from scratch under the 45 minute time pressure of the free response section.
What oscilloscope skills do I need for AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism lab investigations?
The oscilloscope is the primary instrument for the RC circuit and RL circuit investigations and an important tool for the Faraday induction investigation. The skills needed are: setting the time base and voltage scale so the full charge or discharge curve is visible on screen, using the cursor function to read voltage and time values at specific points on the trace, capturing a triggered single sweep for a transient event, and distinguishing the channel ground reference line from the zero voltage value. The exam does not test oscilloscope operation directly, but it does ask students to describe how they would measure the time constant of an RC circuit using equipment available in a physics laboratory, and an oscilloscope is the standard answer. Practice enough with the instrument to describe the connection, scale, and readout procedure clearly in a written sentence.
Are AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism lab investigations the same at every school?
No. College Board authorizes AP Physics C: E&M as a course requiring inquiry based laboratory investigation, but it does not specify a fixed numbered list of investigations that every school must use, in the way that some AP science courses have a named required lab list. Local teachers design or select investigations suited to their available equipment, laboratory period length, and curriculum sequence. The six investigations described on this page represent the investigations most commonly conducted in authorized AP Physics C: E&M programs, based on alignment to the CED's five units and the experimental methods science practice. Your school may use a subset, may use additional investigations such as electrostatic force measurement with a torsion balance, or may substitute a simulation for an investigation requiring specialized equipment. What matters for the exam is that you have practiced the calculus based data analysis and experimental reasoning skills the investigations are designed to build.
How is the AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism lab component graded?
The AP Physics C: E&M exam has no separately scored lab component in the way some other AP science exams do. Lab experience is assessed indirectly through the experimental design and data analysis subparts embedded in the three free response questions, which together with conceptual and calculus based subparts make up 50% of the exam score. A typical experimental subpart is worth 2 to 4 points out of the 15 to 18 points on a full free response question. There is no lab practical portion, no portfolio submission to College Board, and no separate lab score reported on the AP score report. Your school may include lab performance in the course grade, but that component is separate from the AP exam score.
More AP Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism resources
Explore More Free Resources
All our AP resources and tools are 100% free
Turn lab investigations into FRQ points
An AI tutor that works released AP Physics C: E&M FRQs with you, scores your experimental design subparts against College Board rubrics, and explains exactly where your reasoning earns or loses points.
Start free with Tutorioo